Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluates pain relief and safety of genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis, suggesting effective outcomes.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated pain and functional outcomes, safety, and differences between embolic agents in genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee osteoarthritis. Forty-five studies including 2205 patients were analyzed. Across predominantly uncontrolled studies, clinically relevant improvements were observed, with pooled Visual Analogue Scale reductions of − 37.5 points at 1 month and − 37.1 at 12 months. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index improved by − 28.9 at 1 month, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Pain by + 23.6 at 6 months. Mean changes exceeded clinically important thresholds. No significant subgroup interaction between permanent and temporary embolic agents was observed. The most frequent adverse events were transient skin discoloration (11%) and hematoma (3%). Overall, the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: