Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a novel approach to coal surface characterization, indicating enhanced efficiency in intelligent processing.
Coal surface morphology plays a pivotal role in advanced coal processing operations, encompassing comminution, beneficiation, flotation kinetics, and intelligent process optimization. However, conventional characterization approaches are inherently labor-intensive and susceptible to inter-operator subjectivity, hindering their integration into autonomous industrial monitoring systems. To surmount these challenges, this study proposes an explainable morphology-aware coal surface characterization framework that synergizes unsupervised pseudo-label generation, targeted data augmentation, and explainable artificial intelligence. Initially, a high-dimensional feature set comprising grayscale intensity statistics, entropy, edge density, and Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix descriptors was extracted from 454 coal surface images. Subsequently, Principal Component Analysis and K-means clustering were implemented to identify intrinsic morphology-driven structural patterns, generating robust pseudo-labels without manual annotation. These pseudo-classes were utilized to train and benchmark multiple transfer learning architectures, including EfficientNetB0, VGG16, and MobileNetV3. Experimental results demonstrated that MobileNetV3 achieved superior classification efficacy under a strict leakage-safe evaluation configuration, exceeding 90% across key performance metrics while offering significantly lower computational complexity—ideal for edge-computing deployment. Furthermore, Grad-CAM-based interpretability analysis validated that the models focused on physically significant morphological features, such as fracture boundaries and heterogeneous texture transitions. These findings indicate that the proposed framework provides a robust, computationally efficient, and interpretable decision-support tool for smart beneficiation and intelligent industrial coal processing environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mustafa Coşar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: