Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates causal relationships between AI equity and ESG Green Bond markets, implying investment strategies for higher education institutions.
Purpose Higher education institutions (HEI) increasingly depend on sustainable financing to support long-term research, infrastructure development and innovation. As investment in artificial intelligence (AI) expands alongside institutional commitments to sustainability, understanding the interaction between AI-related financial markets and environmental, social and governance (ESG) Green Bond markets becomes increasingly important. This study aims to examine the time-varying and asymmetric causal relationship between AI equity markets and ESG Green Bond markets, with particular attention to its implications for sustainability-oriented investment decisions in higher education. Design/methodology/approach A quantile Granger causality framework is combined with a rolling-window approach to capture time-varying and distribution-dependent causal relationships. By conducting causality tests across multiple quantiles and sub-samples, the analysis identifies asymmetric and tail-dependent effects that are not observable with conventional mean-based Granger causality tests. Findings Results show that AI market movements consistently precede changes in ESG-Green Bond markets, while the reverse relationship is significant mainly in extreme quantiles. The rolling-window analysis reveals that causal links are significant during periods of market stress and insignificant under stable conditions, indicating state-dependent interactions between AI and ESG assets. Practical implications The findings suggest that HEI should consider market conditions when integrating AI-related investments with sustainability-focused financial strategies. In stable periods, AI and ESG assets may complement each other in long-term portfolios, while during volatile periods, stronger spillovers may reduce diversification benefits. Originality/value This study provides novel evidence on the asymmetric and time-varying relationship between AI and ESG financial markets. It highlights the importance of distribution-sensitive methods for informing sustainable investment decisions in higher education and contributes to understanding the dynamic nexus between technological innovation and sustainability-oriented finance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: