This article analyzes the complex interplay of social processes in post-coup Myanmar, revealing the contradictions in civil war dynamics.
This article advances efforts to decolonise the study of civil war by conceptualising warscapes as relational conjunctures. While the warscapes literature emphasises how conflict reshapes local socio- political relations, a conjunctural approach highlights how wars capes emerge from dynamic interrelations between multi-scalar social processes, producing seeming contradictions within local landscapes of war. These intersections also reveal the lasting but uneven legacies of colonialism and postcolonial statebuilding on contemporary civil wars and their spatiality. Applying this frame work to post-coup Myanmar, the article challenges two dominant portrayals of the conflict – as binary (‘us against them’) or irretrie vably fragmented (‘many against many’) – for being state-centric and for obscuring colonial and postcolonial continuities. Instead, the article provides a conjunctural analysis of southeast Myanmar, which has incubated both democratic revolutionary politics and criminalised economies since the 2021 coup. It links these apparent contradictions to historic social processes that continue to gener ate tensions within Karen ethnonationalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shona Loong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: