Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective trial assesses allergy to dental materials, highlighting methacrylate reactivity and late detection yields.
BACKGROUND: Patch testing is used when delayed-type hypersensitivity to dental materials is suspected, but no European baseline series exists for patients with suspected allergy to dental materials. OBJECTIVES: To describe patch test positivity to a 24-allergen dental series, assess the added yield of late readings at D6/7 and characterise methacrylate reactivity patterns. METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre study, 439 adults referred between 2016 and 2025 for suspected allergy to dental materials were patch tested with an institutional 24-allergen dental series comprising 11 metals, 8 methacrylates and 5 other substances. Reactions were read on D3 and D6/7 and scored by ICDRG criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 50.1% of patients had at least one positive reaction, and 41.0% had a positive metal reaction. Nickel (23.0%) and palladium (16.6%) were the most frequent allergens. Amongst methacrylates, HEMA (3.6%), HPMA (3.0%) and EGDMA (2.5%) were most frequent. Amongst methacrylate-positive patients, 44.4% had two or more positive reactions, 40.7% were HEMA-negative and 14.8% were HEMA-negative but HPMA-positive. Across all allergens, 19.8% of positive reactions were detectable only at D6/7, corresponding to a 24.7% relative increase in detection compared with D3 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Late readings improved detection, and methacrylate reactivity was not fully captured by HEMA alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bizjak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: