Evaluates heavy metal immobilization in contaminated soils, suggesting effective remediation methods.
Soil contamination by heavy metals (HMs) [or potential toxic elements (PTEs)] poses serious risks to ecosystems and human health. Metals persist in the environment and can reach groundwater and freshwater as part of the food-chain. In soils, anthropogenic inputs dominate over geogenic sources. Metal mobility is strongly controlled by factors such as pH, mineralogy, and erosion processes that transport metal-bearing clay fractions. Wind and water can transport soil, mainly clay particles that can usually bind contaminants such as HMs. Using waste material is a tool suggested from the circular economy, so waste becomes a valuable resource. This study evaluates the immobilization efficiency of several heavy metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) using phosphate amendments—synthetic hydroxyapatite, phosphatic rock from Florida and Morocco—applied to a brownfield site. Heavy metal immobilization followed a two-step mechanism: first rapid surface complexation and secondly partial dissolution of hydroxyapatite and ion exchange with Ca, leading to the precipitation of metal-substituted hydroxyapatite phases. Synthetic hydroxyapatite generally shows the best efficiency, whereas phosphatic rocks were less effective but still provided a measurable immobilization. From a circular economy perspective, however, phosphatic rocks remain attractive due to their lower cost, availability, and waste-valorization potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: