Key result
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) resulted in a lower mean radiation dose to the myocardium (3.99 Gy) compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy (5.33 Gy) in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer.
Why the study?
Synchronous bilateral breast irradiation is technically challenging and evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes is limited.
Does VMAT or IMRT reduce radiation dose to the cardiac conduction system, myocardium, lungs, and coronary arteries compared to 3D CRT in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer?
Observational (n=9)
Open-label
No
Does VMAT or IMRT reduce radiation dose to the cardiac conduction system, myocardium, lungs, and coronary arteries compared to 3D CRT in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.99% vs 5.33%
p-value: p=0.054
VMAT is the optimal radiation therapy technique for sparing the myocardium, LADA, and lungs in synchronous bilateral breast cancer, though 3D CRT delivers slightly lower doses to the cardiac conduction system.
VMAT may reduce myocardial dose in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy; leaves open whether this improves cardiac outcomes.
Purpose Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques to select the most optimal one. Methods We compared three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during irradiation of synchronous bilateral breast cancer in nine patients followed by examination of dose distribution to the cardiac conduction system (SA node, AV node and Bundle of His), myocardium, lungs, left anterior descending artery (LADA) and right coronary artery (RCA) . Results VMAT is the most sparing technique for SBBC treatment. Even though doses to the SA node, AV node and Bundle of His were higher with VMAT (D mean were 3.75 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.83 and 3.03 ± 1.18 Gy respectively) compared with 3D CRT (D mean were 2.61 ± 0.66, 1.52 ± 0.38 and 1.88 ± 0.70 Gy respectively), this difference is statistically insignificant. Doses to the right and left lung (average D mean = 12.65 ± 3.20 Gy, V 20Gy = 24.12 ± 6.25%), myocardium (D mean = 5.33 ± 1.51 Gy, V 10Gy = 9.80 ± 3.83%, V 20Gy = 7.19 ± 3.15%, V 25Gy = 6.20 ± 2.93%), and LADA (D mean = 10.04 ± 4.92 Gy, V 20Gy = 18.17 ± 13.24% and V 25Gy = 15.41 ± 12.19%) were highest with 3D CRT. The highest D mean in the cardiac conduction system (5.30 ± 2.23, 3.15 ± 1.61 and 3.89 ± 1.85 Gy respectively) was observed with IMRT, and a similar effect was noted in RCA (D mean = 7.48 ± 2.11 Gy). Conclusion VMAT is the optimal and satisfactory radiation therapy technique for sparing organs at risk (OARs). With VMAT, a lower D mean value was noted in the myocardium, LADA, and lungs. The use of 3D CRT significantly increases the dose of radiation reaching the lungs, myocardium, and LADA, which can subsequently cause cardiovascular and lung complications, but not in the cardiac conduction system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salim et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (n=9). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. 3D conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was evaluated on Mean radiation dose (Dmean) to the myocardium (p=0.054). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) resulted in a lower mean radiation dose to the myocardium (3.99 Gy) compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy (5.33 Gy) in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: