Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discusses the role of frequency and reduction in sign languages, suggesting implications for linguistic theory.
Work within variationist corpus-based sign language linguistics often has implications for linguistic theory in general, as this quantitative data-driven approach can be used to test claims in any linguistic theory. In this paper, I discuss a number of previous findings on variation in specific phonological, morphological, and syntactic features in Auslan, New Zealand Sign Language ( Schembri et al. 2009 ; de Beuzeville et al. 2009 ; McKee et al. 2011 ) and British Sign Language ( Fenlon et al. 2013 ) that appear to provide some support for usage-based theories of language. First, I discuss the role of lexical frequency effects and phonological reduction in Auslan, NZSL, and BSL. Second, I explore lexical frequency and the modification of indicating verbs in Auslan ( de Beuzeville et al. 2009 ). Third, I discuss evidence for short-term structural priming in variable subject noun phrase expression ( McKee et al. 2011 ) in Auslan. All of these different sources of evidence provide support for a usage-based theory of sign language grammar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam Schembri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: