Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows machine-learned amplitude surrogates improve precision in phase space, indicating reliable evaluations.
Higher-order theory predictions are crucial for the precision LHC program, but the time-consuming amplitude evaluation challenges the corresponding Monte-Carlo simulations. Machine-learned amplitude surrogates can resolve this problem, if we can guarantee their precision over the entire phase space. First, we show that our surrogates provide a calibrated learned uncertainty, even for non-Gaussian systematics; second, we describe how less accurate phase space regions can be identified; third, we demonstrate how the precision in these regions can be improved reliably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: