Key result
A Lifestyle Intervention Programme (LIP) for congenital heart disease was evaluated via qualitative interviews in 12 patients, identifying needs for dietetic support, education, and an app.
Why the study?
Research on the efficacy of Lifestyle Intervention Programmes in congenital heart disease is limited, prompting exploration of patients' expectations and experiences to identify determinants of adherence and areas for program development.
What are the expectations and experiences of patients with Congenital Heart Disease regarding Lifestyle Intervention Programmes?
What are the expectations and experiences of patients with Congenital Heart Disease regarding Lifestyle Intervention Programmes?
Lifestyle Intervention Programmes for patients with Congenital Heart Disease require tailored development, including health psychology, dietetic support, and specific education to address barriers to adherence.
Small qualitative data highlight needs for dietetic support and apps in CHD; leaves open whether lifestyle programs improve outcomes.
Medical advancements have significantly improved survival of patients with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD). Consequently, an aging CHD population are more susceptible to cardiac-related complications and co-morbidities. Early intervention, with individually-tailored, patient-centred approaches targeting physical activity, diet and stress, can reduce these modifiable risks. Lifestyle Intervention Programmes (LIP) are safe, cost-effective interventions, aiming to promote positive health behaviour change. CHD LIP efficacy research is limited. This study aims to explore patients’ expectations and experiences to better identify determinants of patient adherence and aspects of LIP that need developing. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Group 1 included seven patients who had not taken part in a LIP to establish views and expectations of LIP. Group 2 included five patients who participated in 3-month pilot LIP at Guy's and St Thomas' to gather feedback on their experience. Three key themes were identified from Group 1 data: Expectations of Lifestyle Intervention Programme and Intentions to Engage, Views about Online Support for Lifestyle Intervention Programme, Patient Anxieties about Exercise Damaging their Heart. Four key themes were identified from Group 2 data: Insufficient Dietary Information, Brilliant Intentions Marred by Barriers, Pertinence of Plans to Patients, Positive Patient Experiences and Outcomes. This study provides new insight into beliefs, expectations and experiences of patients with CHD. Findings support the value of LIP for CHD and inform recommendations for LIP development including need for health psychology, dietetic support, more education, greater focus on techniques to address barriers to adherence and scope for specifically-designed App.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tosunlar et al. (2021) studied Congenital Heart Disease (n=12). Lifestyle Intervention Programme (LIP) was evaluated on Patient expectations, experiences, and determinants of adherence. A Lifestyle Intervention Programme (LIP) for congenital heart disease was evaluated via qualitative interviews in 12 patients, identifying needs for dietetic support, education, and an app.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: