Key result
Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies were associated with lower heart rate variability and more severe coronary stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Limited studies have investigated the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and CHD using objective measures of heart rate variability and coronary stenosis.
Are cognitive emotion regulation strategies associated with heart rate variability and coronary stenosis severity in patients with coronary heart disease?
Case-Control (n=501)
Are cognitive emotion regulation strategies associated with heart rate variability and coronary stenosis severity in patients with coronary heart disease?
Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies are associated with worse heart rate variability and more severe coronary stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease.
Should not yet change CHD management; hypothesis-generating for emotion regulation effects on HRV and stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: Despite longstanding interest in emotion regulation and cardiovascular health, limited studies have investigated the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation (CER) strategies and coronary heart disease (CHD) using objective measures of heart rate variability (HRV) and coronary stenosis. This study aimed to objectively explore the associations between CER strategies and both HRV and coronary stenosis and provide empirical evidence for the relationship between emotion regulation and CHD. METHODS: Questionnaires on CER strategies were distributed to 251 CHD patients and 250 healthy persons. HRV and coronary stenosis were measured for CHD respondents using the 24-h dynamic electrocardiogram and coronary angiography, respectively. RESULTS: CHD patients with low HRV/severe stenosis used maladaptive emotion regulation more frequently and adaptive emotion regulation less frequently. Various maladaptive emotion regulation strategies (e.g. acceptance, rumination, putting into perspective) were positively associated with lower HRV and coronary stenosis severity, while adaptive emotion regulation strategies (e.g. positive refocusing, refocusing on planning) were negatively associated with lower HRV and coronary stenosis severity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more serious diseases exhibited increased maladaptive emotion regulation, which was associated with lower HRV and severe coronary stenosis. Further, adaptive emotion regulation was associated with higher HRV and moderate coronary stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Coronary heart disease (n=501). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Heart rate variability and coronary stenosis severity. Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies were associated with lower heart rate variability and more severe coronary stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: