Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in product design frequently encounters a ‘translation gap’ between abstract cultural philosophy and engineering specifications, alongside ‘semantic drift’ across multimodal generation chains. To address these challenges, this paper presents a General Protocol for Cultural-Philosophy-Driven Generative Design, demonstrated through the development of a ‘Zhonghe’ (Harmonious Moderation) Ming-style armchair. The methodology formalises cultural knowledge into a machine-executable Form–Meaning–Technique (FMT) parameter dictionary, distilled from a classical corpus of 1,287,605 characters. By integrating Stable Diffusion with ControlNet and a projection-based 3D verification loop, the workflow enforces cross-modal consistency through three quantitative metrics: bilateral symmetry (S), motif matching (M), and colour difference (ΔE via CIE76). Validation thresholds are statistically determined using the ROC–Youden index (S≥0.80,M≥0.85,ΔE<5) to trigger targeted backtracking upon violation. Comparative results indicate that this closed-loop protocol significantly outperforms unconstrained baselines (e.g. SD-only, MJ-only), achieving high-fidelity outcomes (Best Scheme: S ≈0.968,M≈92.6\%,ΔE≈2.11) while ensuring structural feasibility. This study contributes an auditable, quantifiable decision framework that bridges the disconnect between traditional cultural aesthetics and modern engineering design constraints.
Ru et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: