Key result
Higher total physical activity linked to lower clustered metabolic risk, whereas sedentary time tracks higher risk.
Cross-Sectional (n=17,750)
Yes
Effect estimate: B=-0.080 (95% CI -0.114 to -0.046)
Cross-sectional study examines how physical activity and sedentary time affect metabolic risk in type 2 diabetes patients, suggesting health benefits from increased activity.
OBJECTIVE: Investigating the association between total physical activity, physical activity in different domains and sedentary time with clustered metabolic risk in patients with type 2 diabetes from Jiangsu province, China. DESIGN: Interview-based cross-sectional study conducted between December 2013 and January 2014. SETTING: 44 selected townships across two cities, Changshu and Huai'an, in Jiangsu province. PARTICIPANTS: 20 340 participants selected using stratified cluster-randomised sampling and an interviewer-managed questionnaire. METHODS: We constructed clustered metabolic risk by summing sex-specific standardised values of waist circumference, fasting triacylglycerol, fasting plasma glucose, systolic blood pressure and the inverse of blood high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-cholesterol). Self-reported total physical activity included occupation, commuting and leisure-time physical activity. The un-standardised regression coefficient [B] and its 95% CI were calculated using multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS: This study included 17 750 type 2 diabetes patients (aged 21-94 years, 60.3% female). The total (B=-0.080; 95% CI: -0.114 to -0.046), occupational (B=-0.066; 95% CI: -0.101 to- 0.031) and leisure-time physical activity (B=-0.041; 95% CI: -0.075 to -0.007), and sedentary time (B=0.117; 95% CI: 0.083 to 0.151) were associated with clustered metabolic risk. Total physical activity, occupational physical activity and sedentary time were associated with waist circumference, triacylglycerol and HDL-cholesterol, but not with systolic blood pressure. Commuting physical activity and sedentary time were significantly associated with triacylglycerol (B=-0.012; 95% CI: -0.019 to -0.005) and fasting plasma glucose (B=0.008; 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.01), respectively. Leisure-time physical activity was only significantly associated with systolic blood pressure (B=-0.239; 95% CI: -0.542 to- 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Total, occupational and leisure-time physical activity were inversely associated with clustered metabolic risk, whereas sedentary time increased metabolic risk. Commuting physical activity was inversely associated with triacylglycerol. These findings suggest that increased physical activity in different domains and decreased sedentary time may have protective effects against metabolic risk in type 2 diabetes patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=17,750). Physical activity and sedentary time was evaluated on Clustered metabolic risk (B=-0.080, 95% CI -0.114 to -0.046). Total physical activity was inversely associated with clustered metabolic risk (B=-0.080; 95% CI -0.114 to -0.046), whereas sedentary time increased metabolic risk (B=0.117; 95% CI 0.083 to 0.151).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: