Prospective study examines dietary adherence impacts on mortality and disability in older adults, indicating potential health and environmental benefits.
BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological studies have revealed a relationship among planetary health diets (PHDs), diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), and mortality. However, these studies did not include older adults from non-Western countries. This study examined these associations in Japanese older adults. METHODS: This prospective study included 8, 043 adults aged ≥65 years from the Kyoto-Kameoka study in Japan. Dietary intake was estimated using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Adherence to PHDs was evaluated by calculating the EAT-Lancet index (range, 0 [worst] to 42 [best]), which were classified into 4 categories: ≤25 (n = 1 061; very low), 26-27 (n = 1 703; low), 28-30 (n = 3 368; moderate), and ≥31 (n = 1,911; high) points. Diet-related GHGEs were calculated using previously developed GHGE tables for each food item. RESULTS: During the median 4.75-year follow-up period, 659 deaths and 1 431 incidents of functional disability were recorded. After adjusting for confounders, the hazard ratios of mortality were lower in the moderate-adherence group than in the very low-adherence group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval; 0.60-0.93). Planetary health diet scores tended to be inversely associated with functional disability (p for trend = .081). However, diet-related GHGEs were not associated with mortality or disability. The PHD score ranges with the lowest hazard ratios for mortality and mean diet-related GHGE were 28-30 and 29-31 points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate adherence to current PHD is inversely associated with diet-related GHGE and mortality risk. This underscores the importance of dietary shifts for improving public health and environmental sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: