The open-source software (OSS) ecosystem aggregates hundreds of millions of contributors and massive code repository resources.Open-source communities serve as a critical component of the ecosystem,effectively supporting global collaboration and playing a pivotal role in innovation activities across cutting-edge technological fields.In any practical activity,behavioral pattern is the overt manifestation of engagement,behavioral motivation serves as the internal driving force,and behavioral incentives act as external triggers that reinforce individual actions.This paper conducts an empirical study of Chinese OSS contributors' behavior,aiming at bridging the research gap in a systematic research on localized OSS practicesandadvancing the high-quality development of the OSS ecosystem in China.A mixed-methods research approach was adopted to construct a model examining Chinese OSS contributors'behavioral patterns, motivation, and incentives.The key findings are as follows.First,Chinese OSS contributors engage in both project-level participation and ecosystem-level participation,and code-related behaviors account for over 60% of contributions.While Chinese OSS practices exhibit diversity comparable to international OSS practices,there remains a relative lag in producing high-quality ecosystem-level outcomes.Second,Chinese contributors demonstrate significantly higher recognition of intrinsic motivation compared to extrinsic motivation.A striking 82% of contributors engage in OSS primarily for personal needs,while only 12% cite commercial conversion as a key motivator.Third,9 kinds of behavioral incentives were identified in Chinese OSS practices,and honor-based incentives are the most prevalent.Incentives relating to career advancement,though another significant kind,remain relatively underdeveloped in the Chinese OSS context.These findings provide empirically grounded evidence for designing OSS collaboration supporting mechanisms and fostering sustainable OSS ecosystems in China.
WANG et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: