Prospective case-control study compares serum biomarkers in endometrial cancer and healthy controls, revealing significant differences in endocan and HE4 levels.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare serum levels of endocan, human epididymis protein 4, sialyl-Tn antigen, and neopterin between women with endometrial cancer and asymptomatic healthy controls, and to explore their discriminatory performance in this case-control setting and clinicopathological associations. METHODS: Prospective case-control study of 133 women with endometrial cancer and 65 healthy controls. Serum biomarkers were measured before treatment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with optimal cut-offs. RESULTS: Endocan levels were significantly higher in endometrial cancer patients than in controls (p<0.001), with an area under the curve of 0.758. Serum human epididymis protein 4 was also elevated in patients (p<0.001), with an area under the curve of 0.702. Neopterin and sialyl-Tn did not differ significantly between groups. Endocan and human epididymis protein 4 were higher in women with lymphovascular space invasion (both p<0.05); however, these associations did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Serum endocan and human epididymis protein 4 were elevated in endometrial cancer patients compared to asymptomatic healthy controls. Neopterin and sialyl-Tn showed no discriminatory value in this setting. Our findings should be interpreted as exploratory and require validation in clinically relevant cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toyran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: