Analyzes membrane performance for treating Batik industry effluent, suggesting enhanced efficiency with ZIF-8 incorporation.
This study produced and analyzed composite membranes composed of polysulfone (PSf), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and Metal–Organic Framework (ZIF-8) for treating effluent generated by the Batik industry. The incorporation of ZIF-8 was performed to enhance membrane efficiency. The findings indicated that ZIF-8 markedly enhanced hydrophilicity and pure water flux of membranes. The M-0.5 membrane containing 0.5 g of ZIF-8 demonstrated superior performance, with a water contact angle of 49.4° and a porosity of 83.5%. In contrast, the ZIF-8-free membrane (M-0) displayed a water contact angle and porosity of 66.3° and 76.7%, respectively. These combined characteristics enabled the M-0.5 membrane to achieve the highest pure water flux of 197.1 L m−2 h−1 at 5 bar. All membranes attained complete total suspended solids (TSS) rejection at 100% efficiency. Turbidity rejection rates ranged from 75% to 92%, whilst color rejection rates ranged from 65.7% to 87.6%. The maximum chemical oxygen demand (COD) rejection observed was 57.9%, achieved by the M-0.25 membrane (0.25 g of ZIF-8) at an operational pressure of 4 bar. Meanwhile, for permeability and hydrophilicity, the ideal loading is 0.5 g of ZIF-8 (M-0.5). This concentration yielded the optimal equilibrium of porosity (83.5%), the minimal water contact angle (49.4°), and the maximal pure water flux (197.1 L m−2 h−1). Nonetheless, the TDS rejection rate was rather low at 8.0–21.1%. The membrane effectively preserved effluent pH stability between 7.9 and 8.3. The aggregation of ZIF-8 at elevated concentrations diminished mechanical strength and selectivity. Additional optimization is required to equilibrate these performance indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kartohardjono et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: