Evaluates integrated passenger-freight transportation feasibility in Maryland, suggesting improved rail system efficiency.
Integrated Passenger–Freight Transportation (IPFT) has gained renewed attention as a strategy to improve rail system efficiency, reliability, and sustainability without extensive new right-of-way construction. However, feasibility and public benefit vary substantially across shared-use corridors, particularly at station nodes where operational, spatial, and land-use factors intersect. This study proposes and applies a station-level, GIS-based screening framework to evaluate IPFT feasibility along Maryland’s MARC Camden and Brunswick Lines, which operate in proximity to CSX freight corridors. Using a multi-criteria approach, stations are assessed across five dimensions: platform separation, track complexity, right-of-way flexibility, adjacent land-use compatibility, and accessibility. Network-based walking and driving service areas and point-of-interest data are used to capture station-area context and access conditions. Results reveal highly uneven IPFT feasibility across stations, with a limited subset exhibiting strong alignment across operational and spatial dimensions. The findings support a selective, pilot-oriented approach to passenger–freight integration and demonstrate the value of early-stage screening tools for future-ready rail planning. The study contributes a transparent and replicable framework that can inform corridor development, investment prioritization, and coordinated passenger–freight strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayed Homayoon Aghili (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: