Review synthesizes advancements in sustainable mechanized fruit harvesting, indicating pathways for energy-efficient solutions.
Fruit harvesting systems are undergoing a paradigm shift toward sustainable and energy-efficient mechanized platforms driven by robotics, artificial intelligence, and advanced sensing technologies. This review synthesizes recent engineering developments in fruit harvesting, focusing on system architecture, fruit detachment mechanics, and mechanized harvesting strategies. It examines harvesting classifications, mechanical principles governing detachment, and pre-harvest factors affecting performance, along with principal mechanisms including shaking, cutting, and alternative detachment techniques. Post-detachment handling and fruit recovery processes are also analyzed, together with economic and sustainability-related trade-offs between manual and mechanized harvesting systems. Recent progress in robotic harvesting systems, machine vision, and multi-sensor fusion is evaluated within the framework of smart orchard engineering, with increasing emphasis on energy-efficient design, resource optimization, reduced postharvest losses, and environmental sustainability as key performance drivers. Despite these advancements, current technologies remain constrained by fruit damage susceptibility, biological variability, limited cross-crop adaptability, and high implementation costs, limiting large-scale adoption in commercial orchards. The novelty of this review lies in establishing a unified engineering framework that links mechanical detachment principles with robotic systems and intelligent sensing technologies under an energy-efficient sustainability perspective, enabling a system-level understanding of harvesting performance and supporting the development of next-generation adaptive and sustainable fruit harvesting systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghonimy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: