Randomized trial finds significant carbon rebound risk associated with digital infrastructure efficiencies, indicating the need for stricter environmental policies.
The synergistic transition toward digital transformation and green development has been widely regarded as a core pathway to achieving sustainable development in knowledge production. Using balanced panel data from 39 economies covering 2018–2024, this study employed a two-way fixed-effects model to examine the associations of the energy efficiency of digital infrastructure and the energy structure with carbon intensity (CI). The findings showed that: (1) Reductions in Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) values were significantly associated with higher macro-level CI (coefficient = −2.1564, p < 0.05), which is consistent with the possibility of a rebound effect in the digital sector. Further, time-series discontinuity tests further suggested that the surge in AI computing power, especially in 2023–2024, may have coincided with a structural shift in this relationship (Chow test, p < 0.05). (2) A Panel Threshold Regression (PTR) identified an optimal renewable energy threshold at 59.82%. Crucially, the carbon rebound effect remained highly significant across both high and low green power regimes, demonstrating that supply-side energy transition alone cannot fully absorb the exponential carbon footprint of digital expansion. Furthermore, Instrumental Variable (IV-2SLS) and Placebo Break Tests confirmed the strict validity of these findings. (3) The emission-reduction benefits related to digital knowledge spillovers appeared to be subject to time lags and a possible energy lock in effect, while current environmental policies and carbon pricing mechanisms appear to impose insufficient constraints. This study provides a crucial quantitative framework for monitoring and evaluating the environmental sustainability of the ICT sector. By highlighting the limitations of pure supply-side greening and the necessity of absolute carbon caps, our findings offer integrated policy approaches to align the exponential growth of Generative AI with global sustainable development goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: