Mechanisms of Cross-Layer Fracturing in Thin Interbedded Formations: Roles of Stress Shadow, Interlayer Stress Difference, and Interface Failure

Hydraulic fracture height growth in thin sandstone–mudstone interbeds is often limited by bedding interface failure and multi-cluster stress interference. In this study, a coupled fracture–matrix interface finite element model was developed for the He-8 sandstone–mudstone interbeds in the Sulige Gas Field and validated against previously published true triaxial hydraulic fracturing experiments. The simulations indicate that vertical–horizontal stress difference (VSD; the difference between overburden stress and minimum horizontal stress within a layer) promotes fracture-height growth, whereas interlayer stress difference (ISD; the minimum horizontal stress contrast between adjacent layers) acts as a stress barrier that promotes bedding interface shear failure and arrests vertical growth. For the investigated reservoir configuration, each 4 MPa increase in VSD increased fracture height by approximately 1.5 m in the three-cluster case and 1.8 m in the four-cluster case, whereas each 2 MPa increase in ISD reduced the average fracture height by approximately 4.0 m in the three-cluster case and 3.5 m in the four-cluster case. Under moderate ISD, increasing the fluid viscosity was more effective than increasing the injection rate alone, although the benefit depended on cluster number and interface failure state. These results clarify how stress contrast, interface strength, and multi-cluster stress shadows jointly control cross-layer fracture propagation in thin interbedded reservoirs.