Qualitative interviews with Swiss healthcare providers reveal critical lessons for future health emergencies, suggesting policy improvements.
Despite Switzerland’s wealth and the strengths of its healthcare system, the country faced challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, it is crucial to reflect on this period and to focus on the lessons learnt to prepare for future, inevitable public health emergencies. To better understand the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for healthcare practice and preparedness, we conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of 57 Swiss healthcare providers (SHPs) involved in the care of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. SHPs affiliated with the following types of organisations and roles were included in our target group: nursing homes, hospitals, ambulance organisations, primary care, home care institutions, ethicists with clinical and non-clinical affiliations and cantonal administration. We analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. We identified six themes: (1) experience as a valuable resource requires active use; (2) healthcare workforce needs to be strengthened; (3) knowing patients’ will needs to be a guiding principle; (4) collaboration as key to navigate decentralisation; (5) preparedness requires strengthening of various healthcare domains; (6) restriction measures need to be proportionate and transparent. Our results yield several implications for policy-making to better navigate future health crises. Lessons learnt need to be documented and institutionalised, and the healthcare workforce strengthened. A focus should be on the promotion of advance directives and enhanced coordination across institutions. Sustained governmental support and clear policy frameworks are required to guide decision-making, resource allocation and to enable preparedness at organisational and national levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stock et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: