Evaluates urban restorativeness influenced by accessibility elements, showing significance for inclusivity in urban design.
Previous research has primarily focused on the restorative effects of environments on the general population, often overlooking the specific restorative capacity of urban settings for the disabled population. There is a lack of comprehensive investigation into the interaction between accessibility elements and urban restorativeness. This study, conducted in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China, categorizes streetscape accessibility elements for the disabled population and develops a recognition system based on an enhanced DeeplabV3+ framework. Semantic segmentation of streetscape accessibility elements was performed using 201,860 sampling points and 807,440 street view images. This study employed a combination of TrueSkill scoring, sentiment semantic analysis, LDA topic modeling, and LAB color clustering to quantify and visualize urban restorativeness. The impact of accessibility elements on urban restorativeness was explored using the XGBoost-SHAP model. Results indicate significant effects of architectural space constraints and high-density motor vehicle distribution on the safety of the disabled population’s mobility. The low pixel ratio of accessibility facilities and signs indicates insufficient infrastructure, while high landscape recognition rates exhibit significant spatial coverage heterogeneity. Detection rates for the disabled population in street views are nearly zero, highlighting a severe lack of inclusivity in pedestrian environments. Urban restorativeness exhibited a pattern of being higher in the south and east, and lower in the north and west. Among the accessibility elements, public green spaces (PGS) contributed the most to urban restorativeness, accounting for 25% of the impact, and the study elucidates the mechanisms through which various elements affect urban restorativeness. This absence stems from spatial competition, missing co-design, threshold effect conflicts, and color interference mechanisms. This research breaks away from traditional linear analytical frameworks and reveals the complex non-linear relationship between accessibility elements and urban restorativeness through the XGBoost-SHAP model, providing a quantitative decision-making tool for planning accessible environments in high-density cities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: