This computational analysis reveals adsorption characteristics of green ligands on metal ions, suggesting sustainable water treatment applications.
Understanding how environmentally benign organic ligands bind aqueous metal ions is important for developing sustainable ion-capture materials for water treatment. In this work, density functional theory calculations were used to investigate the adsorption of Na⁺, K⁺, Ca 2 ⁺, Mg 2 ⁺, and Al 3 ⁺ ions on citric acid (CA) and tartaric acid (TA), two biodegradable oxygen-rich ligands containing carboxyl and hydroxyl donor groups. Geometry optimizations, frequency calculations, and solvation corrections were performed at the B3LYP-D3/6–311 + + G(d,p) level using the IEF-PCM water model. Six adsorption motifs were examined for each ligand, and the resulting complexes were analyzed using interaction energies, Gibbs free energies, M–O bond distances, BSSE corrections, NBO second-order perturbation analysis, molecular electrostatic potential maps, NCI-RDG analysis, ELF/LOL maps, and global reactivity descriptors. All complexes exhibit negative interaction energies and Gibbs free energies under the adopted computational model, indicating favorable adsorption. The preferred adsorption sites are Site 5 for monovalent ions, Site 2 for divalent ions, and Site 3 for Al 3 ⁺. The overall binding strength follows the order Al 3 ⁺ ≫ Mg 2 ⁺ > Ca 2 ⁺ > Na⁺ ≈ K⁺, consistent with increasing cation charge density, shorter M–O distances, and stronger donor–acceptor stabilization. BSSE corrections are small, confirming that basis-set superposition error has a limited effect on the reported trends. NBO, MEP, NCI, and ELF/LOL analyses collectively show that carboxyl oxygen atoms dominate ion coordination, while hydroxyl groups provide secondary stabilization. CA is favored for Al 3 ⁺ due to its higher denticity, whereas TA shows slightly stronger local coordination for mono- and divalent ions. These findings provide molecular-level guidance for designing biodegradable organic-acid-based motifs for selective aqueous ion capture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darugar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: