Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced BM-MSC proliferation and migration in biofilms, suggesting improved wound healing potential.
The amniotic membrane is widely recognized in regenerative medicine due to its rich content of extracellular matrix proteins and growth factors that confer anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative properties. However, its rapid degradation restricts its standalone clinical use. To overcome these limitations, we developed biofilms by incorporating decellularized human amniotic membrane matrix (dHAM) into polycaprolactone (PCL) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) matrices using spin-coating. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) were used to evaluate film biocompatibility through cell viability, proliferation, and wound healing migration assays. Surface characterization was performed using contact angle measurements, Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Soluble dHAM extracts (4–6 mg/mL) significantly enhanced BM-MSC proliferation at 48 h compared to controls (p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.0001). Both PCL-dHAM and PVP-dHAM biofilms exhibited high cell viability (>90%) and improved initial adhesion. Notably, dHAM incorporation significantly increased wound closure rates at 24 h, reaching 98.47% for PCL-dHAM and 93.13% for PVP-dHAM, compared to 76.56% and 64.20% for pure polymers (p = 0.0001). All scaffolds maintained hydrophilic surfaces (<90°), favorable for cell interaction. The integration of dHAM into PCL and PVP by spin-coating produces biofilms biocompatible with enhanced regenerative potential, representing promising candidates for wound healing applications. In conclusion, these coatings support BM-MSC adhesion, proliferation, and migration, while significantly accelerating wound closure, underscoring their value as advanced bioactive coatings for regenerative medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quezada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: