Randomized trial evaluates microvascular function and energetics in shoulder muscles following rotator cuff injuries, suggesting valuable assessment tools.
Rotator cuff tears (RCT) cause pain and disability in adults. Histological studies indicate that the degenerative process following a rotator cuff tear may disrupt the vascularity and energetics of the shoulder muscles. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) post-contractile blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response and 31phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P‑MRS) offer methods to non-invasively assess muscle microvascular function and energetic status in vivo. This study aimed to evaluate the post-contractile BOLD response and 31P-MRS as potential markers of microvascular function and energetic status of the supraspinatus muscle in individuals with chronic full‑thickness supraspinatus tendon tears and healthy individuals without a tear. Using a 3‑T MR Phillips system, all participants performed five 2‑s maximal isometric shoulder abductions to obtain a post-contractile BOLD response using a custom MR‑compatible dynamometer. Dixon fat/water imaging was used to quantify muscle fat fraction (FF). A surface 31P‑MRS coil acquired spectra concentrations of high energy phosphates and intracellular pH from the supraspinatus and surrounding muscles. Results revealed a lower peak BOLD response (P < 0.01) and longer time-to-peak (P = 0.02) in RCT, indicating impaired microvascular function. Analysis of 31P-MRS spectra showed elevated unlocalized Pi/PCr (P = 0.04) and PDE (P < 0.01) concentrations in RCT, consistent with muscle damage. No differences in muscle PCr (P = 0.30) or pH (P = 0.50) were observed. Overall, these findings support that the post-contractile BOLD response and 31P-MRS may be valuable markers to assess shoulder muscle health status and evaluate therapeutic interventions aimed at improving clinical outcomes following a rotator cuff tear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooper et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: