Demonstrates safety validation in autonomous driving, highlighting the importance of sensor planning integration.
A simulation-based safety validation program for autonomous driving systems following the automotive V-model — Specify → Integrate → Execute → Evaluate. Covers ISO 26262 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA), SOTIF (ISO 21448) scenario classification (T1-T5), closed-loop simulation in CARLA 0.9.15, KPI measurement, coverage analysis, and a GSN safety case with full evidence traceability. Key results: 160 closed-loop runs across 8 SOTIF scenarios, 3/5 safety goals verified, zero collisions with uncertainty-aware planner active. Key finding: sensor trust reweighting (Loop 1) provides zero standalone safety benefit — architecturally dependent on uncertainty-aware planning (Loop 2). Extended with interface-level failure propagation analysis measuring how sensor failures traverse the perception-planning pipeline. Failure Propagation Coefficient (FPC) metric developed and validated across 45 injection runs. Methodology validated against Foretellix Safety-Driven V&V Guide (2024).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nihar Vaghela (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: