Exploratory study describes procedural variations and educational insights from video review in NICUs, suggesting improvements in care.
Background/Objectives: The Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and the Medical University of Vienna (MUV) both implemented video recording and review in their neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The two centers initiated collaborative, multicenter video review sessions to facilitate international knowledge exchange. Methods: In this exploratory, descriptive study, collaborative video review sessions were organized with the interprofessional NICU staff of the LUMC and the MUV. We aimed to describe our experience with organizing these sessions and to report procedural variations, and document lessons learned that led to new perspectives on care. Results: We conducted five sessions using recordings of different patients undergoing intubation, less invasive surfactant administration, umbilical, central-catheter insertion and physiologically based cord clamping after birth. The videos were selected to ensure technical and clinical comparability. Sessions were attended by a mean of eight providers per center. A total of 19 relevant differences were described, of which seven (37%) prompted changes in practice or new insights for one or both centers. Finally, we developed a roadmap for organizing multicenter video review sessions. Conclusions: This study shows that multicenter video review may represent a feasible and innovative educational approach for identifying practice variations and fostering cross-institutional clinical refinement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heesters et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: