Retrospective analysis identifies adverse events of zavegepant in patients, suggesting safety implications.
Background/Objectives: The recent approval of the first intranasal calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist (CGRP-RA), zavegepant, has increased the relevance of this drug class in treating acute migraine. However, introducing an alternative delivery method may result in a different real-world safety profile. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess adverse events (AEs) related to zavegepant through a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis. Methods: We analyzed Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) presenting zavegepant as the suspected drug, submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) database between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2025. ICSRs were assessed by using descriptive and disproportionality analyses. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as disproportionality measures. Results were deemed significant if the ROR 95% CI lower bound was >1 and ≥3 ICSRs were available for each drug–event pair. Results: A total of 509 zavegepant-related ICSRs were identified. Most ICSRs involved female patients (n = 353; 69.4%), with a median (quartile 1, Q1–quartile 3, Q3) age of 45 (34–56) years. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) Preferred Terms with the highest RORs were nasal discomfort (n = 62; ROR = 298.85; 95%CI [228.91, 390.17]), rhinalgia (10; 126.09; [67.34, 236.09]), dysgeusia (147; 94.72; [78.19, 114.75]), pharyngeal ulceration (3; 79.20; [25.42, 246.75]), and upper-airway cough syndrome (16; 62.87; [38.19, 103.49]). Conclusions: These results suggest a safety profile for zavegepant consistent with previous knowledge regarding CGRP-RAs. However, nasal and/or oropharyngeal AEs, plausibly related to intranasal exposure, may affect perceived tolerability and timely use, warranting further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cicala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: