This article examines changes to the Czech beneficial ownership register and implications for EU regulations on transparency around ownership information.
This article examines the Czech beneficial ownership register after the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgment in WM and Sovim, which invalidated mandatory unrestricted public access to beneficial ownership information. It argues that the Czech access model changed materially after public access was disabled on 17 December 2025, but remains transitional pending full transposition of Directive (EU) 2024/1640. The article separates the continued anti-money-laundering function of the register from its access regime and places the Czech development in comparative European Union context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karel Brychta (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: