Prospective cohort study evaluates COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in healthcare workers, indicating strong protection with booster doses.
Introduction A vaccine's ability to protect against disease acquisition is considered one of its most important aspects of effectiveness. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers (HCWs). Materials and methods This was a prospective cohort study conducted with HCWs from April 2021 to May 2022. Vaccination data and PCR-confirmed infections were extracted from the Comprehensive COVID-19 Information System. Vaccine effectiveness for AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), and Sputnik V was evaluated using incidence rates per 100,000 person-days and multivariable time-dependent Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, and occupational characteristics. Result Among the 3365 participants, all individuals received at least one dose, 95.3% received at least two doses, and 36.7% received a three doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. During follow-up, 517 SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified, with an overall incidence rate of 42.65 per 100,000 person-days (95% CI: 39.12–46.49). Vaccine effectiveness increased with successive doses.The overall effectiveness after three doses was estimated at 92% (95% CI: 81–97). By vaccine type, effectiveness after three doses was highest for AZD1222 (98%; 95% CI: 96–97), followed by Sinopharm (93%; 95% CI: 42–99) and Sputnik V (83%; 95% CI: 13–97). Higher infection rates were observed among females and certain occupational groups with greater exposure risk. Conclusion Completion of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule, including booster doses, markedly reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among healthcare workers. Vaccine effectiveness increased with successive doses, peaking after the third dose. AZD1222 demonstrated the highest effectiveness, while all vaccines provided substantial protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahdavi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: