BACKGROUND: The lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign is known to be correlated with greater anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. The LCL sign has also been correlated to risk for graft failure following ACL reconstruction, but its association with global joint hyperlaxity or concomitant injury such as ramp lesions or Segond fractures has not been assessed. This study aims to determine whether generalized joint hyperlaxity, ramp lesion, or Segond fractures are associated with a higher incidence of the coronal LCL sign in pediatric ACL-deficient knees. METHODS: A retrospective review of ACL reconstruction patients less than 19 years old with clinically reported Beighton scores was performed over 8 years. The presence of the LCL sign was determined from magnetic resonance imaging, and cohorts were developed based on Beighton scores into a "lax" cohort (Beighton ≥6) or "normal" cohort (Beighton <6). RESULTS: A total of 100 children met criteria (42% female, mean age 14.6±2.1 y, range: 9.0 to 18.5 y) with 87 normal and 13 lax patients. The LCL sign was identified in 64% of patients with a similar presence in the lax (62%) and normal (64%) cohorts (P=1.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of ramp lesions in the positive LCL sign (55%) and negative LCL sign cohorts (42%) (P=0.211). Further, there was no significant difference in the proportion of Segond fractures in the lax (0%) and normal (6%) cohorts (P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The LCL sign appears to be an independent predictor of ACL pathology that is not affected by generalized ligamentous laxity, presence of ramp lesions, or Segond fractures. In combination, these results suggest that the LCL sign may be specific to the type of instability introduced by an ACL tear, independent of other concomitant sources of knee instability (traumatic or atraumatic). Moreover, the LCL sign is potentially an independent predictor of potential ACL graft failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.
Pedrick et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: