Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis examines respiratory health outcomes among surface and underground miners, suggesting integrated interventions are needed.
Occupational lung diseases remain a significant public health concern in mining populations, particularly in high-exposure environments. This study examined occupational exposure profiles and respiratory health outcomes among surface and underground miners in Mpumalanga Province. A cross-sectional analytical design was employed among 239 mine workers. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, occupational exposures, behavioural factors, and respiratory outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models. Underground miners were significantly more likely to report high dust exposure (44.9% vs. 24.1%), poor ventilation (60.6% vs. 39.3%), and longer working hours (>8 h: 68.5% vs. 50.0%) compared to surface miners. They also reported a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms, including chronic cough (45.7% vs. 25.9%), shortness of breath (41.7% vs. 23.2%), wheezing (34.6% vs. 18.8%), and diagnosed lung disease (23.6% vs. 9.8%). Multivariable analysis showed that underground mining (AOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.08–3.41), smoking (AOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.02–3.11), and high dust exposure (AOR = 2.89; 95% CI: 1.45–5.76) were independent predictors of chronic cough. A significant interaction between smoking and underground mining (AOR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.32–5.68) further amplified respiratory risk. Additionally, underground miners demonstrated lower levels of knowledge (48.8% vs. 66.1%) and poorer preventive practices (44.1% vs. 64.3%). These findings highlight the combined influence of occupational and behavioural factors on respiratory health and highlight the need for integrated interventions to reduce the burden of occupational lung diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masekameni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: