Evaluates error rates in Urdu-English code-mixed speech, suggesting specific model configurations for improved transcription.
This study presents the first systematic zero-shot evaluation of compact OpenAI Whisper variants, Tiny (39M parameters), Base (74M), and Small (244M), on Urdu-English code-mixed speech, a linguistic phenomenon ubiquitous among educated urban Pakistani speakers yet largely unaddressed in automatic speech recognition literature. A purpose-built corpus of 327 recordings from 11 bilingual speakers was constructed, stratified into three tiers of mixing intensity: mild, moderate, and heavy. Nine experimental conditions were evaluated by crossing three model sizes with three language inference configurations: Urdu-forced, English-forced, and automatic detection. Recognition quality was assessed using Word Error Rate (WER) alongside Switch Point Error Rate (SPER), a diagnostic metric formalized in this work to isolate transcription failures at language-transition boundaries. Results demonstrate that recognition error increases monotonically with mixing intensity, with up to 36.6% WER inflation from the mildest to the heaviest tier. SPER exceeds 0.93 across all nine conditions universally, revealing that language boundaries constitute systematic failure zones rather than incidental error sites, a structural deficit attributable to monolingual pre-training rather than insufficient model capacity. The Small variant paired with English-forced inference achieves the lowest error rate (WER = 0.899) and the highest consistency (CV = 10.72%), making it the recommended configuration for practical deployment. These findings provide quantitative evidence of where and why compact Whisper models fail with code-mixed South Asian speech, along with concrete deployment guidance for practitioners working in multilingual settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah Haroon Mohammed haroon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: