Randomized trial evaluates climate change impacts on water resources in a high-Andean basin, suggesting urgent management adaptations.
Climate change is expected to significantly alter hydrological regimes in high-altitude tropical basins, where water availability strongly depends on precipitation variability and groundwater processes. The Ramis River basin, a major tributary of Lake Titicaca in the Peruvian Altiplano, is particularly vulnerable to hydroclimatic variability due to its dependence on seasonal water resources. This study evaluates the impacts of climate change on runoff, groundwater recharge, percolation, and renewable water resources using the SWAT hydrological model calibrated and validated for the period 1981–2024. Future projections were developed using the MPI-ESM-MR and ACCESS1-0 global climate models under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios for the period 2025–2100, applying bias correction through CMhyd. The results indicate a strong sensitivity of basin hydrology to climate forcing. Under the MPI-ESM-MR model, runoff decreases by up to 68% under RCP 4.5, while extreme increases exceeding 130% are projected under RCP 8.5. In contrast, ACCESS1-0 shows moderate reductions in most scenarios. Renewable water resources exhibit a general declining trend (−23% to −41%), suggesting increasing water scarcity conditions. Additionally, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) reveals a higher frequency and persistence of drought events toward the end of the century, particularly under high-emission scenarios. Overall, the findings indicate that the Ramis River basin may face a dual hydroclimatic risk characterized by reduced water availability and increased hydrological extremes. These results highlight the need to integrate climate projections into water resource management and to implement adaptive strategies to reduce future water vulnerability in high-Andean basins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mamani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: