Examines pro-environmental behaviors and intentions in nature tourism, indicating psychological factors influencing actions.
Despite widespread pro-environmental awareness, tourists’ behaviors often fail to align with their intentions, creating a persistent intention-behavior gap in nature-based tourism. Drawing on social dilemma theory, this study reframes that gap as a weakening of conditional cooperation within shared-resource systems under perceived social loafing. Using a longitudinal field survey (Study 1, N = 263) and an incentive-compatible experiment (Study 2, N = 427), this study shows that perceived social loafing weakens the translation of pro-environmental intentions into actual behavior. This moderating effect operates through two parallel psychological defenses: powerlessness and moral disengagement. An anonymous donation task involving real monetary sacrifice further shows that the gap is most pronounced under high-cost conditions. These findings advance theory by framing the intention-behavior gap as a collective-action problem, clarifying the psychological mechanisms underlying behavioral withdrawal, and offering practical guidance for destination managers seeking to foster sustainable tourist behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: