Demonstrates improved speech quality in urban settings, suggesting better communication and comfort.
Urban acoustic environments and performing-arts spaces strongly influence speech communication quality, acoustic comfort, and public wellbeing, particularly in noise-exposed shared environments such as transport hubs, campuses, healthcare spaces, public service facilities, music-education settings, and rehearsal or performance-related spaces. To address speech–noise separation in low signal-to-noise ratio and acoustically complex scenarios, this study proposes a lightweight two-stage deep learning framework termed LCGRU–Wave-SkipConvNet. In the preprocessing stage, a Lightweight Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit (LCGRU) model is employed to achieve preliminary separation of target speech and background noise by capturing both spatial and temporal acoustic features. In the post-processing stage, a Wave-SkipConvNet model is introduced to further suppress residual noise and enhance speech quality. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior performance under different signal-to-noise ratios, sound-source angles, and target angle errors. For example, in the preprocessing stage, the LCGRU model achieved a perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) score of 2.64 at source angles between 0° and 30°, outperforming the convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) model by 1.17. In the post-processing stage, the Wave-SkipConvNet model achieved higher short-time objective intelligibility (STOI) and segmental signal-to-noise ratio (segSNR) values than the comparison models under different SNR conditions. The proposed framework provides an effective and deployment-oriented AI solution for improving speech accessibility and acoustic comfort in urban acoustic environments and performing-arts spaces. Beyond speech enhancement, it offers practical potential for supporting healthier, more inclusive, and more equitable acoustic environments in noise-sensitive public and educational spaces. It should be noted that this study focuses on the objective acoustic environment and signal-level speech enhancement, rather than subjective soundscape perception, musical perception, or human perceptual evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: