Demonstrates improved communication quality in USV clusters, indicating better performance under dynamic conditions.
Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) clusters operating in maritime environments face dynamic communication conditions, including varying sea states, electromagnetic interference, and satellite denial, that render static communication topologies suboptimal. Existing approaches assess link quality through single indicators, typically the SNR, and lack mechanisms for automatic topology adaptation. This paper presents a multi-layer adaptive communication framework that achieves a mean communication quality score of 0.72 (vs. 0.51–0.66 for baselines), a message delivery rate of 94.1% under benign conditions, and a failure recovery time of 3.2 s (vs. 5.8–8.4 s for baselines) across five communication failure scenarios. The framework integrates three layers: a weighted multi-indicator communication quality metric fusing the SNR, packet loss rate, latency, and link stability into a unified score; a topology utility function that selects among centralized, distributed, and hierarchical topologies by optimizing a quality–threat–overhead objective; and a multi-modal backup communication manager with physics-based underwater acoustic, optical line-of-sight, and multi-hop relay fallback modes. Simulation results demonstrate consistent improvements over single-indicator and static-topology baselines, with particularly strong performance under satellite denial and jamming scenarios where multi-modal backup communication sustains delivery rates above 85% under simulated conditions. In summary, the framework demonstrates consistent improvements across all metrics (communication quality, delivery rate, recovery time) relative to four baselines, with the largest gains observed under the most challenging conditions (satellite denial and jamming). We emphasize that the framework adaptively selects among pre-defined canonical topologies (star, mesh, tree) based on real-time conditions rather than synthesizing optimal topologies de novo—a distinction between topology management and topology optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: