Review of numerical simulation methods correlating failure predictions with destructive tests in composites, emphasizing accuracy and future challenges.
Advanced composite structures are widely used in aerospace and related industries, yet manufacturing defects and in-service damage can significantly reduce their structural integrity, necessitating costly destructive testing. This article reviews numerical methods for simulating composite structural failure, drawing on literature from 2015 to 2024, and assesses their correlation with destructive test results. Progressive damage models, cohesive zone modeling, and finite element implementation strategies are discussed across a range of scenarios including bolted joint failures, open-hole tension, compression-after-impact, and bonded repairs. Well-calibrated models are shown to predict failure loads within 5–15% of experimental values and to reproduce failure modes including fiber fracture, matrix cracking, and delamination. The choice of failure criterion – Hashin, Puck, or LaRC – is found to significantly affect accuracy in matrix-dominated cases. The review concludes that validated numerical simulation offers a credible complement to physical testing in composite certification, with remaining challenges in multiscale modeling, environmental effects, and regulatory acceptance identified as priorities for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Jan Młot (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: