Retrospective study evaluates automated HU measurements for identifying low bone density, suggesting a reliable screening method.
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of automated vertebral trabecular Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements derived from routine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) for identifying low bone density. Methods: This retrospective study included 131 consecutive women (mean age, 53.5 ± 9.6 years) undergoing health screening with FDG PET/CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) between January 2020 and December 2024. A deep learning-based model (TotalSegmentator) automatically segmented the lumbar vertebrae (L1–L4). HU-based metrics in trabecular regions were calculated, and their correlations with DXA-derived bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating mean HU, age, and body mass index was developed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Results: According to WHO criteria, 47 of 131 participants (35.9%) had low bone density. Mean HU demonstrated strong diagnostic performance (area under the curve [95% confidence interval]: L1, 0.861 [0.800–0.923]; L2, 0.852 [0.788–0.915]; L3, 0.861 [0.800–0.921]; L4, 0.845 [0.781–0.909]). L1 mean HU provided the most balanced performance (sensitivity, 0.851; specificity, 0.750); L3 mean HU was slightly inferior. L1 mean HU was strongly correlated with BMD (r = 0.821, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, mean HU independently predicted low bone density (odds ratio: 0.949, p < 0.001). The model achieved an accuracy of 0.786 and demonstrated favorable calibration performance. Conclusions: The automated assessment of vertebral trabecular HU from routine FDG PET/CT provides a reliable and highly efficient method for screening low bone density without additional radiation exposure or cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: