Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative investigation reveals charge trapping mechanisms in amorphous ingazno transistors, suggesting optimization strategies.
In this paper, the transient behavior of amorphous InGaZnO thin-film transistors is quantitatively investigated to clarify the charge trapping dynamics limiting high-speed operation. The transient drain current response is characterized by varying the gate pulse duration (tp) and the operating temperature (T). A power law-based model is employed to extract key parameters (αJT0,i, QT,i, and ni), revealing two temporal regimes separated at to ≈ 7 × 10−3 s. The fast regime (R1) is governed by tunneling-mediated electron capture into shallow traps, whereas the slow regime (R2) originates from thermally assisted transport into deeper traps under electrostatic coupling to accumulated trapped charge. A clear transition in R2 response occurs near T ≈ 333 K. Activation energy (Ea) analysis yields Ea ≈ 0 eV in R1 and Ea = 0.2–0.4 eV in R2 for low T, indicating a transition from tunneling to hopping conduction. These results provide a compact framework for separating fast/slow trapping and optimizing oxide thin-film transistor operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: