Evaluates visual and anatomical outcomes in retinal vein occlusion, suggesting improved treatment intervals with aflibercept.
Background/aims Evaluation of durability outcomes after switching to aflibercept 8 mg for macular oedema in retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods We evaluated eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), switching from other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments to off-label aflibercept 8 mg under an observe-and-plan regimen. Eyes receiving ongoing treatment with ≥10 prior injections were eligible. Treatment discontinuation during the 12-month follow-up period resulted in exclusion. All data were obtained through the review of medical records. Results The overall cohort of eyes with RVO (n=156) achieved a mean interval gain of +1.6 weeks at 12 months (p<0.0001). The proportion of eyes treated at ≤6-week intervals decreased from 37.8% at switch to 17.9% at 12-month follow-up (p<0.0001) while the proportion on intervals ≥9 weeks increased from 37.8% at switch to 60.3% (p<0.0001). The CRVO subgroup (n=65) achieved a mean increase in interval length at 12 months of +2.0 weeks (p<0.0001) and +3.0 weeks in the case of a dry macula at switch (p<0.0001). The BRVO subgroup (n=91) achieved an overall increase in interval length of +1.3 weeks (p<0.0001) and +2.3 weeks for eyes with a dry macula at switch (p<0.0001). The central retinal thickness decreased from 262.8±79.4 µm to 244.6±59.5 µm (p=0.0012) while best recorded visual acuity remained unchanged at 68.2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at 12 months. Conclusion Switching to aflibercept 8 mg substantially reduced the proportion of eyes on short intervals without compromising visual outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: