Review highlights how plant-derived polyphenols enhance cancer therapy, linking mechanisms and delivery methods.
Cancer is still one of the world’s major causes of morbidity and mortality; thus, safer and more efficient treatment approaches are required. The structural variety, multitargeted mechanisms, and generally good safety profiles of plant-derived polyphenols have made them attractive anticancer medicines. Flavonoids (like quercetin), stilbenes (like resveratrol), phenolic acids and curcuminoids (like curcumin) are major classes that have shown strong anticancer action against a variety of cancers, including prostate, colorectal and breast cancers. Through targets including PI3K/Akt, MAPK, NF-κB, and p53 signaling networks, these substances influence important molecular pathways involved in tumor initiation and development, including oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, cell cycle control, angiogenesis and metastasis. The clinical translation of polyphenols is still constrained by poor bioavailability, fast metabolism, low aqueous solubility and inefficient pharmacokinetic characteristics, which lead to insufficient systemic exposure and therapeutic efficacy despite strong preclinical data. Their therapeutic applicability is further complicated by variations in absorption and possible dose-related restrictions. To overcome these limitations, the anticancer efficacy of polyphenols has been enhanced via delivery technologies like polymeric nanoparticles, lipid-based carriers, nanoemulsions and phytosome complexes, which have shown improved stability, increased bioavailability and targeted delivery to tumor tissues. This review provides a comprehensive and integrative analysis of plant-derived polyphenols by linking molecular mechanisms, pharmacokinetic limitations and emerging delivery strategies within a translational framework. By bridging these interconnected domains, this review highlights the potential of polyphenols as viable candidates in next-generation cancer therapeutics and underscores the need for well-designed clinical studies to facilitate their successful integration into oncology practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabbani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: