Demonstrates the effective use of rice husk silica for functional mesostructures, suggesting agricultural waste can be a valuable resource.
Direct utilization of biomass-derived silica in neutral surfactant-templated mesoporous synthesis remains underexplored with respect to mesostructure control and functional integration. High-purity silica extracted from acid-treated rice husk ash (~98.4 wt% SiO2) was employed as the sole precursor in a fluoride-assisted sol–gel route to synthesize MSU-X frameworks without chemical modification. Systematic parametric variation—pH, Si/surfactant ratio, hydrothermal temperature, and aging duration—establishes quantitative structure–processing correlations. Under optimized conditions (pH 2, Si/Tergitol = 8, 60 °C, 96 h), the resulting material exhibits a wormhole-like mesoarchitecture with a BET surface area of 816 m2 g−1, mean pore diameter of ~3.6 nm, and three-dimensionally interconnected channels, confirmed by SAXS, TEM, and N2 sorption. EDXRF analysis confirms effective impurity removal and high silica incorporation efficiency (~95–96%); thermal stability persists to 700 °C, with incipient crystallization near 800 °C. As a functional demonstration, MSU-X served as an anti-agglomeration scaffold for ZIF-8 crystallization during DDT adsorption. Despite attenuated kinetics relative to pristine ZIF-8—where severe agglomeration occludes active imidazole nodes—the Z8/MSU-X composite achieved near-quantitative DDT removal (74.10 mg g−1). This performance stems from the mesoporous matrix driving size-confined, highly dispersed ZIF-8 growth, thereby maximizing active-site exposure. Operating within a reagent-limited regime rather than a capacity-saturated boundary, this efficient depletion confirms that the scaffold successfully suppresses site loss. Ultimately, these findings validate biogenic silica as a directly integrable precursor for tailored mesostructure assembly, positioning agricultural waste as a high-performance feedstock for hierarchical adsorption architectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: