Key result
Higher Reti-CVD scores linked to coronary calcification in asymptomatic adults, modified by waist circumference.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether obesity phenotype, particularly central adiposity, modifies the association between the deep learning-derived retinal biomarker Reti-CVD and coronary artery calcium score in asymptomatic adults.
Does waist circumference modify the association between the deep learning-derived retinal biomarker Reti-CVD and coronary artery calcium score in asymptomatic adults?
Observational (n=237)
Does waist circumference modify the association between the deep learning-derived retinal biomarker Reti-CVD and coronary artery calcium score in asymptomatic adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.15% vs 0.09%
p-value: p=<0.001
Waist circumference-based central adiposity modifies the association between a deep learning-derived retinal biomarker and coronary calcification, suggesting that incorporating obesity phenotypes may improve personalized cardiovascular risk assessment.
Reti-CVD score may flag subclinical coronary calcium; leaves open validation and incremental value in larger cohorts.
Background: The deep learning-derived retinal cardiovascular risk index (Reti-CVD) is a deep learning-derived retinal biomarker calculated from non-mydriatic fundus photographs for cardiovascular risk assessment. This study examined whether obesity phenotype, particularly central adiposity, modifies the association between Reti-CVD and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in asymptomatic adults undergoing routine health screening. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 237 Korean adults who underwent fundus photography for Reti-CVD assessment and cardiac computed tomography for CACS measurement. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference (WC) ≥ 90 cm in men and ≥85 cm in women, and general obesity as body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2. Multivariable linear regression models with sequential adjustment were used to evaluate the association between Reti-CVD and CACS. Effect modification was assessed using interaction terms for Reti-CVD×WC and Reti-CVD×BMI. Discriminatory performance for coronary calcification, defined as CACS > 0, was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Abdominal obesity was present in 78 participants (32.9%), and general obesity in 102 (43.0%). Participants with CACS > 0 had significantly higher Reti-CVD scores than those with CACS = 0 (0.15 ± 0.09 vs. 0.09 ± 0.05; p < 0.001). Reti-CVD remained positively associated with CACS after adjustment for metabolic and lifestyle factors. In fully adjusted models, WC significantly moderated this association (interaction p = 0.0288), whereas BMI did not (interaction p = 0.5381). Overall discrimination for CACS > 0 was moderate (AUC = 0.735) and numerically higher in participants with abdominal obesity than in those with normal WC (0.787 vs. 0.695). Conclusions: Reti-CVD is independently associated with coronary calcification, and WC-based central adiposity modifies this relationship. Incorporating obesity phenotype may improve personalized interpretation of retinal biomarker-based cardiovascular risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Asymptomatic adults (n=237). Reti-CVD was evaluated on Reti-CVD score in participants with CACS > 0 vs CACS = 0 (p=<0.001). Reti-CVD scores were significantly higher in asymptomatic adults with coronary calcification (0.15 vs 0.09; p<0.001), and this association was significantly modified by waist circumference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: