Key result
Mayo ATTR-CM score provides superior discrimination over AMY score for detecting ATTR-CM.
Why the study?
The Mayo ATTR-CM and AMY scores were derived mainly in White male cohorts with EF >=40%, leaving their performance uncertain in racially, ethnically, and sex-diverse populations and across the EF spectrum.
Does the Mayo ATTR-CM score improve discrimination for ATTR-CM compared to the AMY score in diverse populations?
Cohort (n=2,199)
Yes
Does the Mayo ATTR-CM score improve discrimination for ATTR-CM compared to the AMY score in diverse populations?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.86 (Mayo) and 0.81 (SCAN-MP) (95% CI 0.84-0.88 (Mayo) and 0.75-0.87 (SCAN-MP))
p-value: p=< 0.001
The Mayo ATTR-CM score outperforms the AMY score in identifying patients at risk for ATTR-CM across diverse populations, including women, Black and Hispanic individuals, and those with reduced ejection fraction.
May improve ATTR-CM discrimination over AMY in diverse groups; extends prior scores but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The Mayo transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) and AMY scores were developed to identify patients at risk for ATTR-CM. However, both were derived largely from White male cohorts with preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥40%) and their performance in more diverse populations is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to validate and compare performance of the Mayo ATTR-CM and AMY scores across racially, ethnically, and sex-diverse populations, and across the EF spectrum. METHODS: Two complementary cohorts were evaluated: a Mayo Clinic cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging referral cohort (n = 1,553; 449 [29%] ATTR-CM) and Screening for Cardiac Amyloidosis With Nuclear Imaging in Minority Populations (SCAN-MP), a prospective community-based study of Black or Caribbean Hispanic individuals (n = 646; 43 [6.6%] ATTR-CM). Scores were calculated as published. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (AUC), with comparisons performed using DeLong's nonparametric method. RESULTS: The Mayo ATTR-CM score demonstrated superior discrimination in both cohorts (AUC: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.84-0.88 Mayo; AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.75-0.87 SCAN-MP) compared with AMY (AUC: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.64-0.70 Mayo; AUC: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.62-0.78 SCAN-MP; DeLong P < 0.001 for both). Performance remained robust among individuals with EF <40% and among women. The AMY score showed lower sensitivity across cohorts. Among individuals exceeding score cutoffs, the probability of ATTR-CM ranged from ∼1 in 2 in the Mayo cohort to ∼1 in 6 in SCAN-MP. CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo ATTR-CM score demonstrates strong, consistent performance across diverse populations, including women, Black, and Hispanic individuals, and those with reduced EF, and outperforms the AMY score. Its reliance on routinely available clinical and echocardiographic data supports automated implementation and may facilitate earlier detection of ATTR-CM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carey et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=2,199). Mayo ATTR-CM score vs. AMY score was evaluated on Discrimination for ATTR-CM assessed using receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (AUC) (AUC 0.86 (Mayo) and 0.81 (SCAN-MP), 95% CI 0.84-0.88 (Mayo) and 0.75-0.87 (SCAN-MP), p=< 0.001). The Mayo ATTR-CM score demonstrated superior discrimination for ATTR-CM compared with the AMY score in both the referral cohort (AUC 0.86 vs 0.67) and community cohort (AUC 0.81 vs 0.70; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: