Key result
Serum PGC-1α fails to reflect acute ischemic duration during CABG.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether PGC-1α could serve as a marker of myocardial ischemia by reflecting cross-clamp time in patients undergoing CABG.
Observational (n=44)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 1.43% vs 2.06%
p-value: p=0.608
PGC-1α does not reflect ischemic duration or acute myocardial injury during CABG, but is independently associated with diabetes mellitus and ICU duration.
Does not support PGC-1α as ischemia marker in CABG; hypothesis-generating for DM and ICU associations in small observational data.
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate whether peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1α) could serve as a marker of myocardial ischemia by examining its association with cross-clamp time, which reflects the duration of ischemia, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods The study included 44 adult patients who underwent open-heart surgery at the Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic between June 2024 and December 2024. Serum samples separated from the blood collected after cross-clamping and at the pump outlet were analyzed in our hospital’s central laboratory for the PGC-1α study. PGC-1α levels were analyzed in terms of clinical parameters, lactate and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels of the patients. Results Preoperative PGC-1α levels did not differ significantly from postoperative levels (2.06 ± 5.75 vs. 1.43 ± 3.35, p = 0.608), whereas hs-cTnT levels increased significantly after surgery ( p < 0.001). Preoperative PGC-1α showed a moderate positive correlation with DM ( r = 0.366, p = 0.015) but no significant association with other clinical variables, including ICU duration ( r = 0.078, p = 0.616), glucose, or HbA1c (all p > 0.05). In the multivariable analysis, DM (odds ratio [OR] = 3.060, p < 0.05) and ICU duration (OR = 1.466, p < 0.05) were independently associated with PGC-1α, whereas preoperative glucose and HbA1c were not. ROC analysis demonstrated that hs-cTnT showed a significant discriminative ability for cross-clamp time in non-DM patients (AUC = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.684–1.000, p = 0.002), whereas this relationship was not observed in DM patients. In contrast, PGC-1α did not demonstrate a significant discriminative performance in either group (AUC = 0.300–0.535, p > 0.05). Conclusion PGC-1α was not associated with cross-clamp time or conventional markers of acute myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, indicating that it does not reflect ischemic duration. In contrast, hs-cTnT levels were significantly associated with the cross-clamp time in non-diabetic patients, whereas this relationship was not observed in diabetic individuals. The association of PGC-1α with diabetes mellitus and ICU duration suggests that it may reflect metabolic status rather than acute myocardial injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldız et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=44). PGC-1α levels vs. Preoperative vs postoperative levels was evaluated on Change in serum PGC-1α levels before and after aortic cross-clamping (p=0.608). Serum PGC-1α levels did not significantly change after aortic cross-clamping and were not associated with cross-clamp time, indicating that PGC-1α does not reflect acute ischemic duration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: