Key result
Suprahepatic venous tumor thrombus is not linked to worse survival versus infrahepatic extension in advanced RCC.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the prognostic value of venous tumor thrombus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma undergoing radical resection and inferior vena cava thrombectomy.
Does the extent of venous tumor thrombus (suprahepatic vs infrahepatic) affect survival in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for advanced renal cell carcinoma?
Cohort (n=64)
No
Does the extent of venous tumor thrombus (suprahepatic vs infrahepatic) affect survival in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for advanced renal cell carcinoma?
p-value: p=0.40
Radical nephrectomy with venous tumor thrombus thrombectomy and primary IVC repair is safe, and the extent of IVC tumor thrombus extension is not a poor prognostic factor for early or late survival.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the prognostic value of venous tumor thrombus (VTT) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing radical resection and inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with radical nephrectomy for RCC and associated VTT (2000-2024). Patients were dichotomized into Neves 0-II (infrahepatic) and Neves III-IV groups (suprahepatic) IVC involvement for univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (34 Neves 0-II and 30 Neves III-IV) were analyzed. No significant differences in patient or cancer characteristics. Neves III-IV was associated with greater blood loss (> 2 L) (62.1% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.02), greater intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) (4.4 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.02), and postoperative LOS (11.0 vs. 6.5 days, p = 0.005). Overall, 30-day mortality was only 1.6% with a mean follow-up of 56.1 months. Local recurrence was 7.8% and IVC patency 96.9%. One-year survival was 82.0%, 5-year survival was 58.4%, and 15-year survival was 42.5% without significant difference between Neves levels. CONCLUSIONS: Radical nephrectomy with VTT thrombectomy and primary IVC repair is safe with high early survival and low local recurrence. Extent of IVC tumor thrombus extension is not a poor prognostic factor for early or late survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chao et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Advanced renal cell carcinoma with associated venous tumor thrombus (n=64). Suprahepatic IVC involvement (Neves III-IV) vs. Infrahepatic IVC involvement (Neves 0-II) was evaluated on Overall survival (p=0.40). Suprahepatic venous tumor thrombus extension (Neves III-IV) was not associated with worse overall survival compared to infrahepatic extension (Neves 0-II) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (p=0.40).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: