Evaluates glycemic response to low-calorie date snacks in healthy adults and type 2 diabetes, indicating promising dietary options.
Background The global rise in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, driven by high-sugar snacks, underscores the need for low-calorie, fiber-enriched alternatives that attenuate postprandial glycemia while maintaining cultural appeal in date-consuming regions. Objectives This study nutritionally characterized low-calorie date-based snacks (LCDBSs) formulated with Sagai/Sukkari date paste (1:1), nuts, and oat or psyllium fibers at 5%, 7.5%, or 10% (OF1-3, PF1-3). Methods The formulated snacks were organolyptically and nutritionally evaluated as well as postprandial glycemic responses in 20 healthy adults (fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL, BMI average 23.39 kg m − 2 ) and 20 T2D patients (HbA1c 6.5−9.0%, fasting glucose 126-171 mg/dL) via standardized 100 g portions of sensorily preferred 7.5% variants (OF2, PF2) versus control (CF), measuring capillary glucose at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min was examined. Results Proximate composition revealed dose-dependent increases in dietary fiber (12.61–17.55% vs. 7.86% in CF), reductions in available carbohydrates (48.24–52.06% vs. 55.16% in CF), and energy (349.72–368.31 kcal 100 g −1 vs. 384.98 kcal 100 g −1 in CF). Bar incorporated psyllium boosting minerals like K (1203.89 mg 100 g −1 in PF3), Mg (181.06 mg 100 g −1 in PF1), and Fe (3.94 mg 100 g in PF3). Regarding sugar profile, fructose (4.78–6.25% vs. 8.27% in CF), and glucose (4.68–6.09% vs. 8.20% in CF). Across formulations, the snacks retained high phenolic contents and antioxidant activity (TPC 475–598 mg GAE 100 g −1 ; DPPH-RSA 616–773 μmol TE 100 g −1 ), exhibited nutritionally balanced amino-acid profiles (essential amino acids 383–441 and non?essential amino acids 509–566 mg 100 g −1 ; EAA: NEAA ratio 0.68–0.87), and maintained a favorable fatty-acid pattern dominated by oleic and linoleic acids (MUFA 36.82–37.7%, PUFA 23.89–26.36%, with SFA 36.24–39.09%). Both OF2 and PF2 significantly blunted glucose excursions compared with control (p < 0.05), with PF2 superior (lower peaks at 60–120 min in both groups), confirming a low glycemic potential. Conclusion These findings position psyllium/oat-enriched LCDBSs as viable, culturally relevant options for glycemic control, weight management, and T2D dietary interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alhuwaymil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: