Assesses SOH estimation in lithium-ion batteries, suggesting effective methods for incomplete data.
To improve the accuracy and robustness of state-of-health (SOH) estimation for lithium-ion batteries under incomplete and discontinuous charging data, this paper proposes a discrete-time physics-informed neural network (DT-PINN) tailored to random charging segments. Within random state-of-charge (SOC) windows during constant-current charging, three-scale voltage features, including macroscopic positional, morphological-energy, and local differential-geometry descriptors, are constructed to improve inter-cycle comparability and aging sensitivity. In parallel, temperature, current rate, and time are embedded into a discrete-time degradation driver coefficient, which, together with a capacity regeneration gating factor, defines a physically constrained residual that regularizes the SOH trajectory of fragmented segments. The neural network and physical-constraint modules are jointly trained, and the framework is systematically evaluated on three datasets under full-sample, sparse-sample, and cross-dataset settings. Under the 100% training sample ratio, DT-PINN achieves MAE values of 0.1600%, 0.1379%, and 0.4079% on the three datasets, with a maximum R 2 of 0.9984. With 20% training samples, the MAE remains within approximately 0.4%–1.2% while preserving accurate estimation of early- and mid-stage SOH. Cross-dataset experiments show that fine-tuning with a single labeled target-domain cell reduces the cross-domain MAE from 2.8%–13.2% to approximately 0.2%–0.5%, suggesting that the discrete-time physical constraints can serve as a useful regularization component under the adopted lightweight target-domain adaptation strategy. Compared with the strongest data-driven method under the 20% training sample ratio, DT-PINN reduces MAE by 19.9%. Overall, the proposed method enables accurate SOH estimation without requiring complete life-cycle trajectories and demonstrates methodological effectiveness for incomplete charging fragments on public laboratory datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: